Trustworthy software vs vibe coded - in title, the difference is a claim
There are two kinds of software being built right now.
One is built to be trusted. Designed and reviewed by people who have done this before. Tested against all the weird cases real users actually throw at it. Problems get caught before they ever become a customer's problem.
The other is vibe coded. You describe the app, AI writes it, you ship.
The difference is showing up in the data. Scans of vibe-coded apps in use found over 2,000 critical security holes and hundreds of leaked passwords. 91.5% of them shipped with at least one bug caused by an AI mistake.
The $6.6B platform leading the category was warned about a critical security flaw. They patched it for new projects, ignored existing ones, and left them exposed for 48 days.
This isn't about AI. AI is in both. The difference is the work around it.
For title, the difference is everything. The trustworthy kind gets state rules right, shows the examiner exactly where every flag came from, and gives them a starting point they can verify. The vibe-coded kind runs clean on the demo and misses the unreleased mortgage on file four.
In title, the cost of the second one isn't a refund. It's a claim.
Source: thenextweb.com
